
Did you know that a direct Spanish to English translation of pico de gallo is actually "tip of rooster?"
Living in a portion of the state that is particularly branded by Spanish words I often engage realities that I rarely recognize. Examples? I work in Lagoon beach (Laguna Beach), and drive frequently on a street called the peace (la paz); I live near the city of angels (Los Angeles), and my favorite restaurant is in a town named "without mercy" (San Clemente). The restaurant is called Pedro's Tacos --which I'm pretty sure just means tacos made by a guy named Pedro.
Hmmm, spiritual metaphors abound in those translations. I'm trying to analyze them quickly, and the process brings to mind El Camino Real, the road that connected the California missions along the coast. I think that a majority of the names that exist were determined during the period from 1683 to 1834 when Spanish missionaries and priests collated the American Indians into Christian community.
Perhaps they wandered this road in desolation, and as they walked through San Clemente there was a population of mountain lions, or maybe the terrain was rocky and hostile so they began to call it the place without mercy. I frequently name things --"yellow sweatshirt," "Pink Blanket," my right wrist is "Percy," my left wrist is "Percy's cousin" ... maybe they did this. This has always been done. The place that the Romans crucified Jesus (and others) was named Golgatha --the place of the skull.
(insert transition if you'd like. My mind doesn't have neat, organized transitions --just huge, random leaps)
Humans have a tendency to name things, to assign them with some kind of definition or meaning because it helps orient us on the one hand, but it's also a systemization that brings power and enables economy. Systemization creates a sense of those who know and those who don't. Language is used to norm, label, and assign truth.
When we created truth, yes, I meant to type created, it enabled economic, social, and political "knowns" that could be easily accessed, learned, observed, communicated, etc. to help humans understand the order of our world. The creation of truth was so effective at enabling elitism and organizing and maintaining power that truth became associated with a type of supernatural or divine order that operated at a meta level in the consciousness of all human beings.
Science aided the establishment of truth even more directly because men could take pieces of an emperically "known" world and study them to find pattern, fact, meaning, and "truth" about life and existence. Language and rhetoric aligned with this scientific process of truth formation and denied the existence of things that could not be known or proven through scientifically arranged deductive logic. God cannot be proven through deductive logic, so God was not true.
The church at this moment split from the world at the level of academic pursuit, knowledge, language, politics, economy, etc. The relationship between the world and the church slowly dissipated from that time into an "us" against "them" battle. The mentality of division between the church and the systems of the world only pertained to one matter: proving the existence of God. In all other areas, the church seemed completely oblivious to the way that it aligned with the world at the level of truth formation.
I'll return to this in a moment. The world became enamored with the success of truth, okay, the wealthy and privileged in society became enamored with the success of truth because it allowed them to justify their slight of everyone else who wasn't "upstanding, self-sustaining, male, rich, white, educated, etc."
This seeped not slowly, but simultaneously into the church with religious practices, doctrine, morality, dress, behavior, ... .
(another non-transition)
Where was God? He was in pictures, in songs, on people's lips, a justification for people's practices, a justification for people's bias and judgment of others. He was in heaven waiting to welcome all who believed in him --regardless of their life on earth as long as they were baptized in His name. He was risen to extend grace. He was the "reason for the season." And, he was defined, understood, figured out, taken to our weekly gatherings, and prayed at about our problems, concerns, etc. Truth made God known.
What is the problem? When God said that he was called "I AM," when God hid Moses in a rock so that Moses would not die in the midst of God's glory, when God appeared in a burning bush, and when He made a whale swallow Jonah, when he kept Daniel alive in the midst of the Lion's Den... when he lives in a form and presence and being that is completely incomprehensible and unknown to man it is pretty clear that defining truths, even those "about" God are logical fallacies because his actions, his being, his will is not a convention of human political, economic, social governance, but it is crafted of spirit and the wisdom and the knowledge and the holy unknown of God.
Some Christians today have begun to say that they have faith in God, but that he is not "true." He is not X,Y, or Z that the church says he is. The Holy Spirit comes alive in their hearts to reveal God as a moving, living, active, and incomprehensible diety and they study him to see his action, they pursue him to learn his power and revealation, they desire to know him, not for understanding about him, or his relationship to us, but for His sake. Period.
When God is true, they would say, he is an idol. God condemns those who reduce him to a known form. He banished the Israelites from the promised land for this error.
What do you think? Does truth make God an idol?









